Panel Discussion | September 9 | 9:30-11 a.m. | Online
Anna Lauren Hoffman and Hadar Dancig-Rosenberg
Sponsored by the Algorithmic Fairness and Opacity Group (AFOG).
AFOGâs Justice and Content Governance Panel Series opens with a panel focusing on the problems, potentials, and pitfalls of emphasizing justice in content governance systems. The panel will feature professors Anna Lauren Hoffman and Hadar Dancig-Rosenberg.
Hadar Dancig-Rosenberg
Post-trauma and Post: How Do Sexual Assault Survivors Perceive the Potential Capacity of Facebook vis-Ã-vis the Criminal Justice System to Address Their Needs?
This study is part of a large empirical project about the role of social media as a mechanism for seeking informal justice for sexual assault survivors. Based on 499 responses to an online survey and on 20 in-depth interviews with sexual assault survivors who shared their stories of victimization on Facebook (interviews were conducted with the same interviewees in two waves â before and after the #MeToo), the study explores how sexual assault survivors perceive the potential capacity of Facebook to address their needs, compared to the potential capacity of the criminal justice system. Findings reveal the greater over-all appreciation that survivors have for social media compare to their appreciation for the criminal justice system, thus demonstrate the power of informal justice, but at the same time they also shed light on the limitations of social media to address some of the victimsâ needs and on the risks involved in turning to social media to seek alternative justice.
Anna Lauren Hoffmann
Technological discourses â formations of symbols, statements, and other semiotic elements for representing and knowing âtechnologyâ â make technology possible in part by imbuing it with social and political meaning. Today, these possibilities are evident in debates over the fraught potentials of data technologies and so-called âethical tech.â In this talk, Anna Lauren Hoffmann reconsiders these debates by turning to the pervasive but underexamined idea of potential itself. Though often taken as a generic marker of data technologiesâ (beneficial or harmful) capacities, she shows how the idea of potential does important discursive work by linking present conditions to certain imagined or desired future states. Accordingly, appeals to potential can provide critical insight into the normative assumptions and evaluative frameworks underwriting various projects of âethical techâ today.
Join the webinar
Â
If this is your first time using Zoom, please allow a few extra minutes to download and install the browser plugin or mobile app.
510-642-1464
Catherine Cronquist Browning, catherine@ischool.berkeley.edu,
